Skip to content
ClinCalc Pro
Menu
gi-hepatology

Milan Criteria vs UCSF Criteria for Liver Transplantation in HCC

Criteria to assess eligibility for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Milan Criteria (Mazzaferro 1996): single tumour up to 5 cm OR up to 3 tumours each up to 3 cm, no vascular invasion, no extrahepatic disease. UCSF Criteria (Yao 2001, expanded): single tumour up to 6.5 cm OR 2-3 tumours each up to 4.5 cm with total tumour diameter up to 8 cm. Note: milan_criteria_transplant already in file -- this provides comparison and clinical guidance.

Score interpretation

Outside Milan and UCSF Criteria 0

Macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, 4 or more tumours, or tumour size beyond both criteria.

→ Not a transplant candidate on these criteria. Refer to the hepatobiliary MDT for BCLC staging and locoregional or systemic therapy; downstaging may be considered in selected patients without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread.

Beyond Milan but within UCSF Criteria — Expanded Criteria (Centre-Dependent) 1

Within the UCSF expanded limits (Yao 2001) but beyond Milan.

→ Discuss with the transplant centre: expanded-criteria listing is centre-dependent (UK listing follows the NHSBT selection criteria). Downstaging (TACE or ablation) to within Milan may be attempted.

Within Milan Criteria 2

Single tumour ≤ 5 cm or 2–3 tumours each ≤ 3 cm, with no macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread (Mazzaferro 1996).

→ Refer to a liver transplant centre for assessment. AFP trajectory matters (AFP above 1000 ng/mL or rising predicts a poorer outcome even within Milan); consider bridging locoregional therapy while waiting.

Interpretation bands for the Milan/UCSF Transplant Criteria. Apply clinical judgement and local guidance.

References

Related

Curated clinical cross-links plus same-class fallbacks.

Decision support only — verify against a current formulary, NICE, or your local guideline before clinical use.