Skip to content
ClinCalc Pro
Menu
haematology

CRASH Score for Chemotherapy Risk Assessment in Elderly Patients

Predicts risk of severe (grade 3-4) haematological and non-haematological toxicity from chemotherapy in patients aged >= 65 years. Guides toxicity risk counselling and dose modification decisions in older cancer patients.

Score interpretation

Lower CRASH Score -- Moderate Chemotherapy Toxicity Risk 0–4

CRASH 0-4 -- moderate toxicity risk (~25% grade 3-4 haematological toxicity)

→ Standard chemotherapy planning; consider G-CSF prophylaxis if febrile neutropenia risk > 20% (based on regimen, MASCC, ASCO guidelines); dose reductions for borderline renal function; discuss toxicity risks with patient; CARG-TT assessment as complementary tool; geriatric oncology review; nutritional assessment (NRS-2002 or MNA); physical therapy referral for fitness optimisation; weekly FBC monitoring; antiemetic prophylaxis per regimen emetogenicity.

Higher CRASH Score -- High Chemotherapy Toxicity Risk 5–9

CRASH 5-9 -- high risk (~65% grade 3-4 haematological toxicity)

→ Geriatric oncology assessment (CGA: comprehensive geriatric assessment); dose-reduced regimen discussion (50-75% standard dose with escalation based on tolerance); G-CSF prophylaxis from cycle 1 (filgrastim 5 mcg/kg/day SC days 5-12 or pegfilgrastim 6 mg day 2); consider oral regimens if IV regimen very toxic; discuss best supportive care vs treatment; patient-reported outcome monitoring (PRO-CTCAE); carer involvement in monitoring; weekly FBC, LFTs, renal function; telemedicine follow-up between cycles; CARG-TT for comparison; proactive antiemetic, antibiotic prophylaxis; close monitoring for grade 3-4 events requiring hospitalisation.

Interpretation bands for the CRASH Score. Apply clinical judgement and local guidance.

References

Related

Curated clinical cross-links plus same-class fallbacks.

Decision support only — verify against a current formulary, NICE, or your local guideline before clinical use.